Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is isblank portable?
Not universally, no. > And if not, should we have a public gnulib header that provides it, > rather than regex_internal.h? For isblank, it's so simple that one wonders whether it's worth the effort of gnulibizing it. But if we're going to do it, I'd rather have gnulib redefine ctype.h than to have an isblank.h. (I think this about a lot of the other little gnulib headers, too....)
