Paul Eggert wrote: > I'd prefer having just one ChangeLog for all of gnulib, since it's > easier to follow changes that affect both lib/ and m4/.
I agree there are many changes that affect both lib/ and m4/, and also many simultaneous changes in lib/ and modules/. It would simplify things to have a single ChangeLog instead of these three. doc/ChangeLog can probably stay separate. config/ChangeLog should IMO stay separate, because the srclist variables are just administrative tooling. > Would anybody object if I merged all the ChangeLog files into one, at > the base of the hierarchy? No objection. But it's a waste of your time. We can just as well rename the 3 or 4 ChangeLog files and start a common ChangeLog at the top level now. Bruno
