* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:45:54AM CEST:
>
> This check in m4/readutmp.m4:gl_READUTMP:
> AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct utmpx.ut_exit],,,[$utmp_includes])
>
> detects that as nonexistent [...]
Please ignore that message. I was reading both AC_CHECK_MEMBER and
config.log wrongly, more specifically I overlooked that there is a
second compile test to make up for a failure in the first one.
Sorry about the noise.
To keep myself from missing this again, I applied this patch to the
Autoconf test suite.
Cheers,
Ralf
* tests/semantics.at (AC_CHECK_MEMBERS): Also test with a struct
member.
Index: tests/semantics.at
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/tests/semantics.at,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -r1.56 semantics.at
--- tests/semantics.at 17 Mar 2006 20:37:26 -0000 1.56
+++ tests/semantics.at 26 Sep 2006 09:04:28 -0000
@@ -234,10 +242,12 @@
# Check that it performs the correct actions.
# Must define HAVE_STRUCT_YES_S_YES, but not HAVE_STRUCT_YES_S_NO.
AT_CHECK_MACRO([AC_CHECK_MEMBERS],
-[[AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct yes_s.yes, struct yes_s.no],,,
- [struct yes_s { int yes ;} ;])]],
+[[AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct yes_s.yes, struct yes_s.no, struct
yes_s.substruct],,,
+ [struct sub { int x; };
+ struct yes_s { int yes; struct sub substruct; };])]],
[AT_CHECK_DEFINES(
[/* #undef HAVE_STRUCT_YES_S_NO */
+#define HAVE_STRUCT_YES_S_SUBSTRUCT 1
#define HAVE_STRUCT_YES_S_YES 1
])])
