Hello Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:31:22PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > CVS Libtool's libltdl allows third-party user code to decide over the > > naming of the config header file it may share with it (and whether to > > use one)
> The only project I know of which uses a config header file called differently > is GNU clisp (where it's called "unixconf.h"), but that's because its > autoconf infrastructure started out in 1992 or 1993. Calling a config header file differently is quite convenient if you have a package tree of combined packages. It helps to avoid including the wrong file even in case some include paths (have to) overlap. As to not using autoheader, some of the libtool testsuite tests are packages but don't use autoheader. It saves a bit of time, and it has helped find some quoting bugs in compiler wrappers. :-) Granted, these tests don't use gnulib, and even if they would at some point, there won't be a problem of any importance. Cheers, Ralf
