Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Careful. error.c is (mostly) synced upstream with glibc (right now, all > but the comments and a couple of #include order issues), but this would > widen the gap.
Yes, I see that the matter is not as simple as it seemed at the first glance. > As it is, error.c already has a check inside _LIBC that > does exactly this; since glibc provides program_invocation_name already > set to the right value. Also, how would this interact with the progname > module? In its current state, there is no interaction. > Maybe a better approach would be to make argp and progname play nicely; > and on glibc systems, use the existing program_invocation_name. Hmm, possibly. By the way, progname does more checks when setting program_name, for example it omits eventual 'lt-' prefix, which argp does not. I'd better re-evaluate all this, given your and Bruno's feedback. Regards, Sergey
