Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, how about documenting this > (non-obvious) convention? Something like this:
Thank you. I have applied this change. > Also, one could mention the need of N_(...) in the documentation of > the field 'doc' of struct argp_option as well: No, not quite so. The 'doc' field of argp_option has a different semantics, '\v' does not apply to it. Regards, Sergey
