Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > The reason is that BeOS does not have PF_INET, only AF_INET, but usually
> > they
> > have the same values. Also it doesn't have PF_UNSPEC.
>
> Does it AF_UNSPEC? Did you grep the entire /usr/include tree to find
> PF_INET or PF_UNSPEC? Maybe they are in some non-standard header.
It has neither AF_UNSPEC nor PF_UNSPEC, in no header.
> > + #ifdef PF_UNSPEC /* BeOS lacks PF_UNSPEC. */
> > if (family == PF_UNSPEC)
> > return true;
> > + #endif
>
> I'm not sure this will do the right thing. Usually getaddrinfo is
> called with hints structure that is zeroed out, and only the relevant
> flags asserted. If family isn't asserted, it usually means "take any
> family".
I see. Then what about this patch? It compiles fine on BeOS.
2006-08-26 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* getaddrinfo.c (PF_INET, PF_UNSPEC): New macros.
*** coreutils-6.2-cvs/lib/getaddrinfo.c 2006-08-26 21:52:06.000000000 +0200
--- coreutils-6.2-beos/lib/getaddrinfo.c 2006-08-26 23:35:16.000000000
+0200
***************
*** 42,47 ****
--- 42,56 ----
#include "snprintf.h"
#include "strdup.h"
+ /* BeOS has AF_INET, but not PF_INET. */
+ #ifndef PF_INET
+ # define PF_INET AF_INET
+ #endif
+ /* BeOS also lacks PF_UNSPEC. */
+ #ifndef PF_UNSPEC
+ # define PF_UNSPEC 0
+ #endif
+
#if defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__
# define WIN32_NATIVE
#endif
