Paul Eggert writes: > > I think it's more that we're worried about having to cater to other > silly compiler incompatibilities with C89. There are so many of them...
Yes, I understand. The camel's nose into the tent.... > But to save time on this I installed your patch Thanks. > (though I used _ > rather than xx as the local variable, just to be ornery :-). You know, I came *this* close to doing that myself, but chickened out at the last minute. :-) -Larry Jones Wow, how existential can you get? -- Hobbes
