Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I really meant ssize_max.h, analogous to size_max.h. Or they > could be combined into one header file.
I think size_max.h is there only because SIZE_MAX is in different headers on different systems. Is that also true for SSIZE_MAX? I don't offhand recall SSIZE_MAX being defined anywhere other than its standard location <limits.h>. If so, then we wouldn't need a ssize_max.h header, and we wouldn't need to overload size_max.h; we could just tell people to include <limits.h>.
