Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, unfortunately it does not, because the target system does not have a > nanosleep function.
OK. Do the other parts of the patch (e.g., the HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H, TIME_WITH_SYS_TIME, etc.) address the problem? If not, what problems do you encounter with the latest version? (We prefer solutions that do not have Windows-specific ifdefs sprinkled all over the place.)
