Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> Wouldn't this be a good situation to have nanosleep depend on the >> unistd module, and make the replacement unistd.h include winsock2.h on >> mingw32 platforms? After all, nanosleep.c include unistd.h, and >> unistd.h define select on some platforms. > > Yes, I'd prefer that. Did you (Simon) just volunteer? :)
I'd prefer to test Paul's approach first.
