Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wonder if adding 'at configure time' at the end of that sentence would help.
Will do. > Should we also provide a collector macro that ensures that all C99 types > and bounds are available, rather than having the user list so many macros > in their configure.ac? Something like AC_TYPE_C99_TYPES might be a > reasonable name. If there's a need for it we can add it, but it would take a long time to execute. C99 defines a lot of types. The gnulib stdint module does a lot of this already. I'll mention it. > Should we also document that a d_ino of 0 on older platforms implies a > deleted file, Yes, I'll do that. > My personal inclination here is that since the cygwin community > always recommends upgrading to the latest version, it is okay if we > don't special-case cygwin in AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_INO. Sounds good to me. Thanks. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
