Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:41:29PM CET: >> >> Seems good. I installed this. Review appreciated (untested). > > All good except for: > >> + if test "$NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE" != "no"; then >> + AC_CHECK_FILE($NAME_OF_NONCE_DEVICE,, >> + AC_MSG_WARN([[Device `$NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE' does not exist, >> consider to use --enable-nonce-device]])) >> + fi > > NAME_OF_NONCE_RANDOM_DEVICE and NAME_OF_NONCE_DEVICE are not the same > variables (two instances).
Fixed, thanks. Now that this is settled, I'm beginning to think that the random functions should be decoupled from GC fully. I.e., there should be a standalone module 'random', and then gc-random could use it. This is more similar to other gc modules. IIRC, CoreUtils random-sort might be one user of this 'random' module. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
