-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Eggert wrote on 2005-11-15:
> > I'd like Bruno's opinion on all this before installing into gnulib.
> >
> > 2005-11-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * lib/stdint_.h (intmax_t) [defined intmax_t]: Do not declare.
> > (uintmax_t) [defined uintmax_t]: Do not declare.
> > (SIZE_MAX) [defined SIZE_MAX]: Do not define.
> > This works around a problem if intmax_t.m4 and/or uintmax_t.m4
> > and/or size_max.m4 are also used. Problem reported by Mark D. Baushke.
>
> Thanks for applying this patch while I was unavailable.
>
> > #ifdef _STDINT_H_HAVE_INT64
> > +# ifndef intmax_t
> > typedef int64_t intmax_t;
> > +# endif
> > +# ifndef uintmax_t
> > typedef uint64_t uintmax_t;
> > +# endif
>
> I'm worried that we arrive at a situation where
> sizeof (intmax_t) != sizeof (uintmax_t),
> if the configure.ac has invoked gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T but not
> gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T or vice versa. I can see two solutions:
> a) Have gl_STDINT_H require gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T and gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T.
> b) Merge gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T and gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T into a single macro
> that defines intmax_t and uintmax_t simultaneously.
> Which one is better?
I believe a merge of the two types is cleaner with gl_STDINT_H to
require this new macro.
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFDwrL8Cg7APGsDnFERAu7DAKCY4b4AE0yUDMdaAS/r/PNNlOUD9ACfbkRh
FmaXH+d4qB/XCO0z1lzqV9w=
=rRrL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
