Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:11:05PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> +#if defined __cplusplus || defined __BEOS__
>> typedef bool _Bool;
>> +#else
>
> This will break on C++ compilers with bool _and_ _Bool, like the HP-UX
> 11.23/IA-64 aCC6 compiler.
I assume the following further patch would fix this? If so, I can
prepare a standalone patch along these lines.
--- stdbool_.h.~1.6.~ 2005-11-25 22:16:30.000000000 -0800
+++ stdbool_.h 2005-11-27 22:13:52.000000000 -0800
@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@
# include <OS.h> /* defines bool but not _Bool */
#endif
-/* C++ and BeOS have a reliable _Bool. Otherwise, since this file is
- being compiled, the system <stdbool.h> is not reliable so assume
- that the system _Bool is not reliable either. Under that
- assumption, it is tempting to write
+/* C++ and BeOS have a reliable bool (and _Bool, if it exists).
+ Otherwise, since this file is being compiled, the system
+ <stdbool.h> is not reliable so assume that the system _Bool is not
+ reliable either. Under that assumption, it is tempting to write
typedef enum { false, true } _Bool;
@@ -88,7 +88,9 @@
existing definition of _Bool and use our own. */
#if defined __cplusplus || defined __BEOS__
+# if !HAVE__BOOL
typedef bool _Bool;
+# endif
#else
# define _Bool signed char
#endif
_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
