Simon Josefsson wrote: > - md4_process_block (memcpy (ctx->buffer, buffer, 64), 64, ctx); > + md4_process_block (memcpy (ctx->buffer, buffer, 16), 64, ctx);
The patch in md4.c:243 doesn't look right. But otherwise it looks more robust than previously. Bruno _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib