Simon Josefsson wrote:
> -           md4_process_block (memcpy (ctx->buffer, buffer, 64), 64, ctx);
> +           md4_process_block (memcpy (ctx->buffer, buffer, 16), 64, ctx);

The patch in md4.c:243 doesn't look right. But otherwise it looks more
robust than previously.

Bruno



_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib

Reply via email to