Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> > 1) now, the appended patch, >> > 2) in a year, change modules/stdbool to require gl_STDBOOL_H, >> >> Sounds good, except why wait for a year between (1) and (2)? >> I don't see the downside of doing (2) now. > > People who update from gnulib in a manual, not always synchronized way, > could be burned. The less trouble a renaming makes, the better.
Sorry, I'm still lost. If we do (2) now, people will still have two years to change their code, no? What is the practical difference between the schedule you originally proposed, and a schedule that consists of doing (1) and (2) now, but (3) two years from now? _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
