Jim Meyering wrote:
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:The problem you describe was more of an automake limitation, and it has been resolved by automake's addition of AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR.Interesting. But AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR is documented just between AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR and AC_CONFIG_HEADERS, which makes me believe that only a single call to AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR in one configure.ac is supported. In this case, it wouldn't help gnulib-tool. Can you confirm the contrary?I haven't used it, but the example in the test case does work that way.Also, do you have an idea about the release date of automake-1.10?No. I can't even predict a release date for coreutils :) _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
automake-1.10 is waiting on m4-2.0 is waiting on libtool-2.0 is due out real soon now.
libtool-2.0 will allow libraries to lt_dlopen other libraries, which
is needed by m4-2.0 that will allow programmatic control of the macro
search path which is needed by automake-1.10.
Not much help... sorry :-(
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
