Simon Josefsson wrote: > A bit weird approach of checking for a compatible type, perhaps, but > if it works, then I'm all for it. Bruno, what do you think?
It's the standard way of determining a function's prototype. At first sight, it would be possible to use a single loop instead of a double loop by using the prototype int getsockopt (int, int, int, void *, $t *); which has only 1 unknown parameter. But some systems like BeOS don't have getsockopt() at all. Therefore I'm in favour of Albert's macro. Bruno _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
