Simon Josefsson wrote: > Yup, I'm using two configure.ac's in gsasl, but I don't want to change > gnutls to use the same scheme for only this reason. And with your > work, I don't have to.
OK, can you try it? The essential changes are already in CVS. > >> How about storing the parameters in the per-directory generated > >> Makefile.am? > > > > An interesting idea: Indeed specifications usually go into .am files, not > > .m4 files. ... > > I don't know if it is a good idea, but maybe it would be possible to > have a gnulib.mk that is included by the auto-generated Makefile.am. > Then gnulib.mk could be stored in CVS, and hold the parameters. But > this change sounds like work for no apparent gain, if the M4 approach > work. I agree that I don't see the gain now. Let's keep it in our minds as an alternative to gnulib-cache.m4 until the gain is clearer. Bruno _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
