On Wed, 24. Aug 2005, 18:39:02 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > Martin Lambers wrote: > > Back in February, I suggested to add EX_OK to the sysexit module > > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2005-02/msg00042.html). > > Is there a reason not to do that? > > It sounds OK to do that; glibc's <sysexits.h> also defines EX_OK. > The only one that doesn't is apparently a private file inside 'postfix' - > irrelevant. > > But EX_OK is semantically the same as EXIT_SUCCESS. So what about this > patch?
I think that the value 0 for EX_OK is obvious enough, so that the extra dependency on the exit module does not provide any real benefits. But as long as EX_OK is defined, I'm happy ;-) Thanks, Martin _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
