Simon Josefsson wrote: >Sorry, it seems the xalloc-die logic has changed, so my patch may be >wrong. Specifically: > >2005-07-15 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * modules/xalloc (Depends-on): Add xalloc-die. > * modules/xvasprintf (Depends-on): Add xalloc-die. > >I can't find the discussion behind this change. Why was a hard >dependency on xalloc-die added? Wasn't the point of separating >xalloc-die from the xmalloc module to allow applications to supply its >own xalloc_die function? Right now I can't avoid the gnulib >xalloc_die implementation in my library, and I want my own >die-function. > >
gnulib-tool now accepts an --avoid <module> parameter: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2005-07/msg00154.html>. Derek -- Derek R. Price CVS Solutions Architect Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> v: +1 717.579.6168 f: +1 717.234.3125 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
