Paul Eggert wrote: >The following patch was installed on gnulib but it looks inadvertent. >I assume it's OK for me to revert it? Or perhaps you could revert it. > >
I reverted it. Sorry about that. I've been maintaining that fork for some time so that more users can compile CVS, even with munged timestamps, despite the fact that GNULIB only supports bison. I will be more careful to commit and fork from different directories in the future. :) Is there a mailing list for CVS commit messages to GNULIB? Thanks, Derek _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
