Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <phil...@posteo.net>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>, stefankan...@gmail.com,
>> acora...@gnu.org, j...@linkov.net, r...@gnu.org, 69...@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:39:32 +0000
>>
>> >> I think I'm missing something here. When it's nil and there is no
>> >> *active* region, but there is a region, it should kill that, surely?
>> >> With or without TMM.
>> >
>> > Yes, you are right. It sounds like we made wrong assumptions about
>> > what happens in that case, and should rethink this.
>> >
>> > C-w signals an error only if there's no mark in the buffer.
>> >
>> > So I guess we need a new command after all.
>>
>> Not necessarily (unless I am mistaken above), but I am not opposed to it
>> either.
>
> If we don't introduce a new command, then what will be the modified
> behavior of kill-region? Specifically, when will it delete the last
> word?
If the new user option is non-nil /and/ there is no region. If
`kill-region-dwim' is nil (default), then nothing should change.
>
> In Emacs buffers, it is very rare not to have the mark, so it
> sounds like the Bash-like behavior will very rarely if ever available,
> no?
It will kick-in whenever `use-region-p' returns a non-nil value. I
recognise that this isn't useful for people who don't rely on transient
mark mode, but in that case we'll need to commands anyway, as I don't
want to use the behaviour that Sean describes.
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin
