Update of bug #58654 (project findutils): Assigned to: None => berny
_______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #4: IMO, POSIX [1] is a tiny bit blurry about whether 'find -perm [-]MODE' shall use the umask value (as e.g. chmod) or not: [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/find.html - "To start, a template shall be assumed with all file mode bits cleared.", - "An op symbol of '+' shall set the appropriate mode bits in the template; [...]" - "'=' shall set the appropriate mode bits, without regard to the contents of the file mode creation mask of the process.". So all we have for the + operator is that it should add the "appropriate" (whatever "appropriate" means in this context) mode bits on top of 0000. Therefore, I think that the current implementation follows the specification. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58654> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/