On Friday, July 28, 2017 11:38:12 Paul Eggert wrote: > The only thing I'd add to that is to suggest using a high value like > 0x40000000 for FTS_NOLEAF.
I am fine with my current patch. If gnulib upstream introduces new flags later on, it will be not that difficult to find a free bit for FTS_NOLEAF. Thank you all for replies! Kamil
