On Friday, July 28, 2017 11:38:12 Paul Eggert wrote:
> The only thing I'd add to that is to suggest using a high value like
> 0x40000000 for FTS_NOLEAF.

I am fine with my current patch.  If gnulib upstream introduces new flags 
later on, it will be not that difficult to find a free bit for FTS_NOLEAF.

Thank you all for replies!

Kamil

Reply via email to