Follow-up Comment #11, bug #51506 (project findutils): > I suggest to consider the choice between additional variants for the program “find”.
I don't think this marginal feature to fall back to basenames for -print (or when no other action is specified) warrants a separate ~200k binary. I propose to create a script like this and save as "$HOME/bin/findbasenames" (or maybe in /usr/local/bin): #!/bin/sh exec find "$@" -printf "%f\n" Have a nice day, Berny _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51506> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/