Follow-up Comment #11, bug #51506 (project findutils):

> I suggest to consider the choice between additional variants for the program
“find”. 

I don't think this marginal feature to fall back to basenames for -print
(or when no other action is specified) warrants a separate ~200k binary.
I propose to create a script like this and save as "$HOME/bin/findbasenames"
(or maybe in /usr/local/bin):

  #!/bin/sh
  exec find "$@" -printf "%f\n"

Have a nice day,
Berny


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?51506>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/


Reply via email to