"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/16/06, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 6/16/06, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > > find $PWD/* -printf '%A@ %p\n'|sort -nr >> > >> > Wow, learn something every day. Thanks. >> > >> > Alas, though, this mishandles files whose time stamps differ only in >> > the subsecond parts, whereas 'ls' by itself would get it right. Looks >> > like 'find' is another program that needs to be updated to be struct >> > timespec-aware. >> >> I thought about this a year or so ago. The obvious thing to do is to >> change %A@ and friends so that they produce a number which is no >> longer an integer. I enquired on the bug-findutils mailing list about >> whether anybody thought that this would break scripts currently >> depending on the existing behaviour. At the time, I took no response >> as "shrug" rather than "no". > > Again, no response :) Should I assume the feature is not useful > enough to incur the time overhead of maintaining it?
Hi James, I think it would be worth maintaining. _______________________________________________ Bug-findutils mailing list Bug-findutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils
