The updatedb script seems to be pretty complex and messy. In addition there are some problems with it. For example, if find returns a nonzero result it carries on regardless, I think.
Finding a way to make updatedb simpler and more robust sounds to me like a good idea. Perhaps part of the problem is that Bourne shell is the wrong language to write it in. I would welcome suggestions and dicussions on the future of updatedb. There are several things that we could do with it: 1. Make updatedb and locate work better over NFS, for example by having a locate database at every NFS mount point. This is possible now but is hard to set up and administer. 2. Replace updatedb with a different (but compatible) program. I have no fixed ideas about what language this should be written in, but there is a problem with dependencies - findutils is often part of the base system, and so making it depend on Perl, Python or Scheme would be problematic for both system administrators and distribution vendors, I think. I'd be reluctant to have that happen. This may mean that in practice we're restricted to shell or C. 3. Enhance find to allow it to output data for the locate database directly. This could simplify updatedb at the expense of greater complexity in find (though implementing FreeBSD's -s option would be a start). Anyway, what do you guys think? James. _______________________________________________ Bug-findutils mailing list Bug-findutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils
