Follow-up Comment #1, bug #13303 (project findutils):
My first instinct is to follow the behaviour of "ls", which seems sensible.
However, I've started a discussion on the bug-findutils mailing list.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=13303>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-findutils mailing list
Bug-findutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils
