Paul Eggert wrote: > On 06/12/2012 07:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Here's a way to solve the problem that doesn't require restoring >> the memset calls. It feels slightly hackish > > But it's hackish in a good way! It's a bit faster > and smaller and more portable than the existing code, > and it's faster and smaller than all the other proposed > fixes. It's clearly the best idea yet. Thanks for > cutting the Gordian knot.
Thanks. With that, I've pushed it and marked this as done.
