Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Would it make sense to depend on the fatal-signal or wait-process module,
> so that you can kill the child process when the parent is sent a catchable
> fatal signal?

I'm inclined not to do that, because it adds complexity for limited
benefit, and the complexity will subtract from reliability in other
ways.  I suppose it might be different if a child process were spun
off in the normal case, but child processes will be quite rare in
practice.

For what it's worth, POSIX allows this behavior, as it doesn't specify
whether utilities are uniprocess.


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to