Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/1464 >> >> but no one has begun work on that, as far as I know. > > Here's a proposed implementation for that idea. It was a bit trickier > than I thought it would be, mostly because I thought of more > optimizations. > > 2004-03-27 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * NEWS: cp -pu and mv -u (when copying) now take the destination > file system time stamp resolution into account. > * doc/coreutils.texi (mv invocation): Document this. > (cp invocation): Document -u (it was missing!) with new behavior. > > * lib/utimecmp.c, lib/utimecmp.h, m4/utimecmp.m4: New files. > * lib/Makefile.am (libfetish_a_SOURCES): Add utimecmp.c, utimecmp.h. > * m4/prereq.m4 (jm_PREREQ): Require gl_UTIMECMP. > * src/copy.c: Include "utimecmp.h". > (copy_internal): Compare time stamps using utimecmp rather than > MTIME_CMP.
Thanks for doing that. I've applied those changes. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
