https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34758
Jens Remus <jremus at linux dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |amodra at gmail dot com,
| |ibhagatgnu at gmail dot com,
| |jremus at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from Jens Remus <jremus at linux dot ibm.com> ---
Indu, Alan,
the proposed patch looks good. How do we deal with such patches? Can we assume
they were written by the reporter, given a LLM was used in finding the issue?
Does this fall under the "LLM generated code that is not legally significant is
OK" [1] exception?
If I wanted to assist to get these fixes upstream, would I send the patch as
authored by Martin Mirchev to the list? Would I send it as authored by myself
with "Suggested-by: Martin Mirchev"?
[1]: The GNU Binutils position on LLM generated content,
https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/LLM_Generated_Content
Martin,
could you please comment whether the fix was entirely authored by yourself or
created using an LLM?
Thanks and regards,
Jens
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
