https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33577
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Ali Bahrami from comment #17) > The old behavior was wrong, as was beaten to death in the > preceding discussion. Hence, not sensible. Undefined > symbols can't belong to a symbol definition version. > > I do understand that having something that seemed to > be stable change can be annoying to deal with, but the > assumption that version 0 was only for definitions isn't > right. Version 0 is for completely unversioned symbols. I think that VER_NDX_LOCAL (0): Symbol has local scope may confuse people. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
