https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33344
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rin Okuyama from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Rin Okuyama from comment #0)
> > > > You can see the size of segment is not changed at all. This results in
> > > > regression of stripped-binary sizes for NetBSD.
> > >
> > > Did you mean segment size, not file size?
> >
> > The segment size difference is kind of random. Please compare segment
> > sizes for "strip -R .note.netbsd.ident -R .note.netbsd.pax" with binutils
> > 2.42 and 2.45.
>
> What we are concerned about is the binary size.
>
> I mentioned the segment size as a cause of increase in the binary size.
>
I saw:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 bug33344]$ ls -l
total 80
-rwxr-xr-x 1 hjl hjl 22072 Aug 31 03:25 hello.242
-rwxr-xr-x 1 hjl hjl 11568 Aug 31 03:25 hello.242.stripped
-rwxr-xr-x 1 hjl hjl 22088 Aug 31 03:28 hello.245
-rwxr-xr-x 1 hjl hjl 11608 Aug 31 03:28 hello.245.stripped
-rw-r--r-- 1 hjl hjl 79 Aug 31 03:24 hello.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 hjl hjl 1288 Aug 31 03:24 hello.o
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 bug33344]$
The 2.45 file size increased slightly due to different section layouts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
