https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33198
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
>
> + if [info exists CLANG_FOR_TARGET] then {
> + set llvm_plug_so [string trim [exec $CLANG_FOR_TARGET
> -print-file-name=LLVMgold.so]]
> + if { $llvm_plug_so ne "LLVMgold.so" } then {
> + set llvm_plug_opt "--plugin $llvm_plug_so"
> + }
> + }
>
> This doesn't work for me:
>
> ```
> $ clang -print-file-name=LLVMgold.so
> LLVMgold.so
>
> $ ls -hal /usr/lib/llvm/20/lib64/LLVMgold.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 119K Jul 19 14:11 /usr/lib/llvm/20/lib64/LLVMgold.so
> ```
> => llvm_plug_opt is empty and then the test is UNTESTED unnecessarily.
>
> But we create the
> /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/lib/bfd-plugins/LLVMgold.so symlink to
> /usr/lib/llvm/20/lib64/LLVMgold.so, so --plugin isn't needed.
>
> We can test it by creating a simple test program with clang -fuse-ld=bfd
> foo.c. If it fails with:
> ```
> clang: error: no such file or directory:
> '/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/lib/bfd-plugins/LLVMgold.so'
> ```
>
> Then --plugin is needed and we can use the existing test.
Can you find a reliable way to locate LLVMgold.so from clang?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
