https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31863

--- Comment #4 from Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org> ---
(In reply to Nick Alcock from comment #3)
> Oh it hasn't -- I see the warnings on MinGW everywhere too. I was merely
> noting that this doesn't seem to align with the behaviour of the actual
> printf in the various libcs MinGW can use, which all seem to support %z just
> fine.

Sure.  This is a GCC thing, not a library thing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to