https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612
Claudio Luck <c.luck at datact dot ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |c.luck at datact dot ch
--- Comment #3 from Claudio Luck <c.luck at datact dot ch> ---
Is this truly a practical problem? Virtually every space-constrained system
makes use of compressed firmware images, or has readily access to that
tecnology.
Thus, I wouldn't expect the accumulated binary size to actually consume
significantly more physical storage.
I ask, because the alleged "fix" [1] to this space issue introduced a
regression [2] which effectively banned GNU/Linux from systems with larger
pagesizes, which, contrary to the assumption in the commit, exist commercially
and in large numbers.
[1]
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=1a26a53a0dee39106ba58fcb15496c5f13074652
[2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
