https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10) > (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #9) > > I fear the only non-contentious answer to all such questions is: "act in the > > same > > way as currently" :-/ I.e. try it out and emulate the behaviour. > > In which case it would also be impossible to fix anomalies there. In turn > meaning that hardly any bug in parsing of input can actually be fixed. Not a > good state to be in. How would you respond to a bug report in such an area > then? "We know it's broken, but it can't be fixed"? We should treat the longstanding usages as features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
