https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to mintsuki from comment #32) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #31) > > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #30) > > > Basically, it tries to find a PHDR which contains the RELA section, and if > > > it find it, it subtracts the PHDR's virtual address and adds its offset in > > > order to find the offset of the RELA section inside the ELF file itself. > > > > In glibc, we know it is a static PIE. We relocate PT_DYNAMIC segment only > > if > > it is ET_DYN. > > So what is the issue? And in any case, it doesn't feel right to me to have This is only after my patch: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=34373 Currently glibc relocates PT_DYNAMIC segment unconditionally. > this behaviour in ld just to work around quirks of a specific ELF loader out > of many. > > If anything, it needs to be handled in glibc, and the behaviour of ld should > be reverted to match gold and lld. > The static PIE generated by ldd with non-zero load address won't work with glibc before and after my glibc fix. I will open an lld issue after glibc is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
