https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31000
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #2)
> .. option:: --set-symbols-visibility <filename>=<visibility_type>
>
> Reads a list of symbols from <filename> and changes their visibility to the
> specified type. Visibility types: default, internal, hidden, protected.
Given the support for "@<file>" for reading in a list of command line options,
is the format above really necessary ?
Using a file containing lots of:
--set-symbol-visibility <symbol>=<vis-type>
entries might require a bigger file, but it would also be more flexible,
allowing for multiple types of visibility to be set, along with other
options as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
