https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31319
Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-31 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> --- So this is precisely the case that the new behavior is intended to catch: It is meaningless to restrict ISA to i386 when trying to build 64-bit code. In the kexec example, the .code32 comes too late anyway (would have wanted to be at least before the label already before); wants moving ahead of the .arch. IOW for now I view this as neither a bug nor a regression; earlier gas simply was to lax. I'm open to be convinced otherwise ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.