https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179
--- Comment #4 from Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Palmer Dabbelt from comment #0)
> 2029e13917d ("RISC-V: Clarify the behaviors of SET/ADD/SUB relocations.")
I guess also a question for the distro folks, but are we sure this commit is
actually what's breaking things? Nelson said that patch only changes the
behavior of .reloc, but as far as I can tell it also changes .uleb128. Maybe
I'm just missing something?
It reverts cleanly, so if someone still has a setup that's failing then I think
it should be easy to check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
