https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16566
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to jon from comment #6) > Not sure why, but with the new patch, the addition of the condition: > > && bfd_link_hash_lookup (link_info.hash, > bfd_asymbol_name (sym), false, > false, true) == NULL > > Seems to prevent the output of the symbols (functions / data when using > -flto) that I'm interested in. Hmmm. That test is designed to catch local symbols which have already been displayed by the normal linker-map-symbol-displaying code. (eg __GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE__). Can you give me a specific example of a symbol which is suppressed by this check, but which should not be ? (A small test case would be ideal...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
