https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29764

--- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Nick,

It seems your patch does the trick, but I imagined we'd want a more general
solution (that is, do we want add such an optional prefix in all targets)?

But yeah, the coincidence can probably be considered vendor-specific?

(I'm not a maintainer though ;-) )

That being said, doesn't adding such a prefix require updating some piece of
documentation?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to