Hi Nick, > Makes sense to me.
Thanks. > No - you would be the first. :-) :-) We could do some trailblazing here. If it works out well, others may want to follow. > Well unless you count the online documentation which is really just > an HTML formatted copy of the .texi files found in the sources. I saw this too. We do have an HTML formatted directory for the gprofng user guide as well, but perhaps we should include it with the major update I plan to do after my vacation (in the second half of August). I've already started working on this. > You can do either. But I am totally OK with you having a sub-directorty > below the sourceware binutils main web directory. That is awesome and I think Kurt will agree :-) Thanks very much, Nick! Kind regards, Ruud
