https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27998

--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
<h...@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5c0b4ee406035917d0e50aa138194fab57ae6bf8

commit 5c0b4ee406035917d0e50aa138194fab57ae6bf8
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 21 10:35:58 2022 -0700

    i386: Don't allow GOTOFF relocation against IFUNC symbol for PIC

    We can't use the PLT entry as the function address for PIC since the PIC
    register may not be set up properly for indirect call.

    bfd/

            PR ld/27998
            * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't allow GOTOFF
            relocation against IFUNC symbol for PIC.

    ld/

            PR ld/27998
            * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998a.d: Replace -shared with -e bar.
            * testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998b.d: Expect a linker error.
            * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386-now.d: Updated.
            * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386-now.d: Likewise.
            * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386.s: Replace @GOTOFF with @GOT.
            * testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386.s: Likewise.

    (cherry picked from commit 8f29211c3f0a6335c17e0a90396c146facf6dba4)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to