I'm debugging a DWARF parser library. We are testing it against GNU readelf,
and we've found a discrepancy on the dump of the interpreted .eh_frame
section of a particular x86_64 ELF binary.
The binary's first FDE in .eh_frame has initial_location 0x1060, and the
following instructions:
DW_CFA_advance_loc 4 # Move PC by 4
DW_CFA_undefined 16 # Change the rule for
R16 to undefined
The linked CIE marks R16 as the return address, and has the following
instructions:
DW_CFA_def_cfa 7, 8 # CFA is at R7+8)
DW_CFA_offset 16, 1 # Set the rule for R16 to
[CFA+1*data_aligment_factor])
The GNU readelf, if executed with --debug-dump=frames-interp, dumps the FDE
as follows:
00000018 0000000000000014 0000001c FDE cie=00000000
pc=0000000000001060..0000000000001086
LOC CFA ra
0000000000001060 rsp+8 u
0000000000001064 rsp+8 u
Meanwhile, the alternative parser thinks that at the range [0x1060-0x1064),
the rule for RA/R16 should be as inherited from the CIE, and it goes rsp+8.
I've debugged readelf (the latest master, as of 06/01/22), to that point.
There are two passes over the FDE instructions: one starting on
dwarf.c:9296, the other starting at dwarf.c:9442. On the first pass, when
DW_CFA_undefined is encountered, there is the following case statement:
READ_ULEB (reg, start, block_end);
if (frame_need_space (fc, reg) >= 0)
fc->col_type[reg] = DW_CFA_undefined;
break;
If I understand correctly, the intended purpose of the first pass is to
allocate enough memory in the fc->col_type and fc->col_offset arrays, and
the logic of this operator's handling was meant to be: if this register was
not mentioned before, allocate space for it, and reset its rule to
undefined. HOWEVER, if the register WAS mentioned before (e. g. in the CIE),
frame_need_space() returns 0, and the if() body executes anyway, and resets
the rule for the register to undefined, erasing the initial state as
specified by the CIE.
I think the if statement should go, instead, "if (frame_need_space (fc, reg)
> 0)". Same for other register-rule-type operators on the first pass.
The binary can be seen at
https://github.com/eliben/pyelftools/issues/409#issuecomment-1136720254
I'd submit a Bugzilla ticket, but registration is closed.
Thank you!
