https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27594
--- Comment #26 from Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin at gmx dot de> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #22) > To be clear, my opinion is that previously the documentation was incorrect. > I do not believe that it was ever the intention that the --preprocessor > option should also accept command line options. It did, yes, and in fact it > still does, So you agree that this behavior worked, for quite some times (years...). And that it worked as documented. This means, of course, that the change in behavior was breaking backwards-compatibility. Whether you liked the original behavior or not is therefore completely irrelevant: a backwards-incompatible change has been slipped in, without appropriate documentation or public announcing, let alone the appropriate deprecation period. That is not okay. > but it should not be relied upon. Arguments to the preprocessor > should always be passed via the --preprocessor-arg option. Whatever you want to do, do it correctly. Do not just break backwards-compatibility nilly-willy. And certainly not (maliciously?) snuck into a "bug fix" release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.